Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
       USE OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
IN BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT AT THE JUDGE ROTENBERG EDUCATIONAL CENTER (JRC)
  • Matthew L. Israel, Ph.D.
  • Judge Rotenberg Educational Center
  • Canton, MA  USA
2
Population
  • 122 Individuals
  • Ages 7- 41
  • 73% school age; 27% adults
  • 50% Autistic-Like; 50% Behavior/Emotional Disorders
  • 61% on Positive Programming only; 39% on Positive Programming + Supplementary Aversives (Skin-shock)
3
Facilities
  • School Building in Canton, MA (suburb of Boston)
  •  21 Residences in Southeastern MA
    • Canton
    • Norton
    • Attleboro
    • Rehoboth
    • Mansfield
    • Stoughton
4
BASIC POLICIES
  • Near-zero rejection/expulsion policy
    • Average case rejected by 6 and ejected from 5 other placements
  • Remove or minimize psychotropic medication
    • Only 2 of 75 who have received skin-shock have also received psychotropic medication
  • Maximize 24hr, consistent behavior modification procedure
5
Administration Building and
Day School
6
Lobby
7
Mickey and Minnie
8
Main Hallway
9
Wall of Student Photographs
10
Wall of Music-and-Movement Clocks
11
Mannequin Sculptures in Hallways (Policemen and Pianist)
12
Mannequin
Sculptures
in the
Hallways
13
Mannequin
Sculptures
(Cleaning
Lady on
the Right)
14
Mannequin
Sculptures
(Proctologist)
15
Coke Stairwell
16
Foyer, Lower Level
17
Lichtenstein
Hallway
18
Warhol
 Hallway
19
Fawn Admires a Warhol
20
Haring Hallway
21
Multipurpose Room
22
21 Residences, such as this one in Norton, MA
23
Lorusso House, Attleboro, MA
24
Old Maple Residence
 in Stoughton, MA
25
Living Room, Old Maple Residence
26
Living Room, Old Maple Residence
27
Kitchen, Old Maple Residence
28
Dining Room,
 Old Maple
Residence
29
Den, Old Maple Residence
30
Bathroom, Old Maple Residence
31
Bedroom, Old Maple Residence
32
Bedroom, Old Maple Residence
33
Classroom for Higher Functioning Students
34
Classroom for Lower Functioning Students
35
JRC Software to Teach Basic Skills
36
JRC Software to Teach Phonics and Spelling
37
JRC Software to Teach Math Facts
38
JRC Precision Teaching Curriculum on SAFMED Cards
39
Networked Computers for Students in the Classrooms
40
Paid Assembly Jobs in Work Activity Area
41
Paid In-School Jobs
42
Competitive Jobs in Local Community
43
Computerized Baby-Think-it- Over Program
44
JRC Graduation
45
Reward Systems & Facilities
46
Frequent intermittent, momentary rewards for not showing problem behaviors
47
Types of DRO Contracts
48
Reward Store in Each Lower Functioning Classroom
49
Reward Box in Classrooms for Lower Functioning Students
50
Contract Store
51
Big Reward Store
52
Big Reward Store
53
Barbecue/Reward Afternoon
54
Field Trip Rewards
55
JRC School Dances
56
TV, Stereo, CD Player, Computer and Sony Playstation in Each JRC Bedroom
57
Students Review JRC-Managed and Self-Managed Behaviors
58
Behavioral Counseling
59
Before-and-After Films of Students who have Benefited from Positive Programming + Supplementary Skin-Shock
  • Before segment shows some of the student’s most problematic behaviors before the start of treatment.
  • After segment shows the student during or after treatment.
60
Use of Aversives at JRC
(May, 2001)
  • Currently JRC serves 122 total students
  • 61% (75 students) receive positive programming only
  • 39% (47) students receive positive programming plus occasional supplementary aversives
61
1971-1989: Non-shock Aversives
  • Water squirt (plant spray bottle)
  • Vapor spray (compressed air + water)
  • Pinch, spank, or muscle squeeze
  • White noise/visual screen helmet
  • Mechanical restraint
  • Combinations of the above
62
Results with Non-Shock Aversives
  • Improvement (but nowhere near as much as with skin-shock)
  • Many students still in partial restraint
  • Continuous struggles with many students
  • Injuries to staff, students and property
63
Safeguards in use of Skin Shock
  • Approval by parents/guardians
  • Individual authorization by family court
  • Human Rights Committee
  • Peer Review Committee
  • Medical and psychiatric contraindications sign-off
  • Daily review by nursing staff


64
Safeguards (Cont.)
  • Close management of direct care staff
  • Video monitoring during school
  • Video monitoring at residences
  • Review of videotapes of each evening and overnight at residences
  • Extensive recording and charting of behaviors
65
24-Hour Video Monitoring of School and Residences
66
Daily Recording Sheet
67
Sample Daily Chart
68
Sample Standard Weekly Chart
69
Sample Monthly Chart
70
JRC’S USE OF SKIN SHOCK
  • Wide variety of behaviors treated
    • Health Dangerous (includes self-abuse)
    • Aggressive
    • Property Destruction
    • Noncompliance
    • Inappropriate urination/defecation
    • Major Disruptive
  • Simultaneous treatment of all behaviors
  • Treatment of antecedents, attempts, and incipient stages


71
JRC’S USE OF SKIN-SHOCK (Cont.)
  • Treatment of shaped down versions
  • Occasional: preventive treatment through behavioral rehearsal lessons
  • Holidays to assist recovery from adaptation
  • Occasional: use in negative reinforcement paradigm
  • Occasional: punishment of wrong answers as refusal behavior



72
 
73
 
74
Feature Comparison:SIBIS, GED and GED4
75
Transmitter
76
Stimulator
77
Battery
78
Battery Pack Holder
79
Electrode Separated from Stimulator Chassis by a Wire
80
Concentric
81
Electrode Placement Sites
82
Spread
83
Spread Electrode: Finger to Palm
84
Spread Electrode: Finger to Finger
85
 
86
 
87
Median Frequency of GED Applications to 47 Current Users = 1.4/wk (May, 2001)
  • This is 1 application every 5 days
  • 47 of 122 current students (39%) have GED in their program.
  • For 37% of these 47 students the median frequency is 0/wk
88
Gabe’s Chart
89
 
90
Holiday to Counteract Adaptation
91
 
92
 
93
 
94
 
95
 
96
 
97
 
98
 
99
 
100
GED & GED-4 JUMP DOWNS
(Monthly SCC Chart)
101
 
102
GED & GED-4 CELERATIONS
(Monthly SCC Chart)
103
New: Increased Use of GED with Higher Functioning Students
  • Emotionally Disturbed
  • Psychotic
  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
  • PDD
  • ADHD
  • Oppositional/Defiant Disorder
  • Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder
  • Conduct Disordered
  • Behavior problems such as truancy, aggression, depression, suicidal actions, fire setting, etc.
104
 
105
 
106
 
107
GED & GED-4 JUMP DOWNS
(Monthly SCC Chart)
108
GED with Higher versus Lower Functioning Students
  • Higher jump-downs
  • Jump-downs usually go to zero
  • Frequencies stay at zero
  • Fading of GED more feasible.
  • Non-treated behaviors also go to zero
109
Discoveries/Conjectures (1)
  • Effective over long period (up to 10 years)
  • Desirability of treating earliest possible phase of the behavior
  • Treatment of wide variety of behaviors feasible (health dangerous, aggression, destruction, noncompliance, major disruptive, inapp. urination/ defecation,etc.)
  • Simultaneous treatment of all behaviors feasible



110
Discoveries/Conjectures(2)
  • Potential for preventive use (behavioral rehearsal lessons)
  • Usefulness of negative reinforcement
  • Start with most intense stimulus available (avoid working up the intensity ladder)
  • Occasional effectiveness through verbal mediation
  • Especially effective with higher functioning students


111
Discoveries/Conjectures (3)
  • Desirable features of device:
    • Adequately high intensity level
    • Wire-attached electrodes
    • Spread electrodes
    • Multiple electrodes
  • Holidays from treatment may promote recovery from adaptation
  • Absence of side effects
  • A treatment of first choice for significant problem behaviors


112
3 Handouts
  • Abstract of Presentation/Program Description (1 sheet, both sides)
  • JRC Newsletter
  • Powerpoint printout of key slides
113
WEB SITES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
  • Site on skin-shock, with abstracts and texts of this symposium:
    •    www.geocities.com/effectivetreatment

  • Judge Rotenberg Center’s web site:
    •   www.judgerc.org

114